Why Laura Loomer Was Right About Firing NSC Officials
Political arena readers are quite aware that most of the scandals from the first Trump Administration came about as leaks from Obama holdovers in his own National Security Council. It wasn't merely leaks. In every case, it was either a partial leak spun with a false narrative, or transcripts that were edited. In simpler terms, a pure hit job.
Trump hater Alexander Vindman is a top example. Democrats tried to impeach President Trump over a phone call he had with corrupt Ukrainian President Zelenskyy about delaying aid until he dealt with some of the corruption problems in his country, because after all the American taxpayer expects their money to be spent properly.
What Trump was unaware of at the time is that the intelligence community's dirty tricks and incredible amounts of money laundering were being funneled through Ukraine. Vindman went on to work for Adam Schiff after he was fired from the NSC and has doubled down on his Trump derangement syndrome multiple times since.
As far as the corporate media outrage over the firings, when President Biden fired all of the Trump holdovers on the National Security Council it was considered business as usual, but God forbid President Trump fire somebody who was handpicked by the treacherous General Milley or another deep stater who has ties to dirty tricks against Trump - only then is it a “scandal.”
PoliticalArena doesn’t always agree with Loomer, but in this case her research is credible. These individuals should have never made it through the vetting process.
Grok AI:
”Loomer targeted Alex Wong, the principal deputy national security adviser, questioning his loyalty due to his wife’s work at the Department of Justice—where she was involved in prosecuting January 6 rioters—and her father’s stake in a Chinese satellite company. Loomer suggested Wong might have sympathies with the Chinese Communist Party, a claim she amplified on social media.”
We have learned with the Hunter Laptop story and the Biden crime family business, that streams of money coming to close family members matter, just like Paul Pelosi using Nancy for insider trading information and getting rich.
And Wong’s wife being a J6 prosecutor where every single defendant, both innocent and guilty, had their due process rights trampled. Speaking for yours truly, if my wife did such a thing to ruin the lives of others she would find herself divorced faster than you can say “discovery.” If she is willing to trample the Constitution for politics, then perhaps so is he.
[Editor’s Note: This now begs the next question — if Trump was not aware of this, so he could make a decision as to if such conflicts of interest are real and have legs, then Loomer is right and the government vetting failed. That is a big miss. What are the odds vetting failed by accident for a position on the National Security Council no less.
All government employees with a high security clearance are required to fill out a form SF-86 which is designed to find all conflicts of interest with you and those close to you. ]
Grok AI:
”Loomer also criticized Ivan Kanapathy, an NSC director for Asia, for his prior role at Beacon Global Strategies, a firm employing former intelligence officials who had dismissed the Hunter Biden laptop story in 2020, which Loomer interpreted as evidence of disloyalty to Trump.”
What those 51 intelligence officials engaged in was deliberate, dishonest, election interference, and what has come out since shows that they full well knew it. They knew that the FBI had Hunter’s laptop since 2019.
Grok AI:
”Other fired staffers, such as Brian Walsh, Thomas Boodry, and David Feith, were reportedly part of her broader list—up to a dozen names—accused of being "neocons" or not fully aligned with Trump’s "America First" policy. Some reports indicate her research included social media activity critical of Trump or links to figures like John McCain and Mitch McConnell, whom Trump opposes.”
Play stupid games, win stupid prizes. Trash Trump on social media and then expect him to give you a paycheck? Really? The bureaucratic resistance Trump faced in his first term was a lesson learned and it is no secret that there are dishonest and election interfering aspects of the intelligence community that are out to get Donald Trump. Trump simply cannot take chances with such people being in such powerful positions.
Corporate media trashes Loomer as a conspiracy theorist, but is that all bad? Last I checked “Conspiracy Theorists” were up almost 100-1 against establishment/corporate media.
UPDATE - All the right people and corporate media are mad about the firings, which indicates Loomer was over the target - LINK.
🎯🎯🎯🎯🎯🎯🎯🎯