UPDATE - As Barnes predicted, a bad judge will not recuse themselves, which actually will work to help Trump in an appeal - LINK.
Famed litigator Robert Barnes explains in some detail why Trump’s lawyers were right to request that Judge Chutkan remove herself from the DC indictment. Not only did she work with a law firm that worked with Hunter Biden, but she has also made public statements expressing her bias clearly.
The problem is that Trump’s attorney’s, thinking of themselves and not the welfare of their client, waited and were too timid in the face of obvious bias on the judge’s part before they filed this motion.
Greta Van Susteren says that not only should the judge be removed, that Trump’s lawyers should have been aggressive on this from the get-go.
Barnes explains why being aggressive in the face of a bad judge is always the right thing to do and why Judge Chutkan has no business presiding over this case. The law sets the bar for recusal, when it comes to a judge having the appearance of impropriety, quite low. Most corrupt judges simply ignore this law and that actually can help Trump in the appeals process.
Trump’s lawyers being squeamish actually makes the appeals process more difficult. Balancing out Trump’s mediocre corporate lawyers; Special Prosecutor Jack Smith “is dumb,” says Barnes:
Note: For those not wishing to become a monthly subscriber, Substack does allow one-time tips/donations!
Jack Smith IS DUMB!!! Not just dumb, but imbecilic, infantile and can’t do JACK!