Appeals Court Rules FDA Smear Campaign Against Ivermectin Illegal - UPDATED!
Thousands of American doctors, as well as many foreign countries such as India, successfully used a cocktail and drugs and supplements, including Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine, to fight off COVID19. This is a fact that cannot be rationally disputed, although it is denied by those whose interests do not align with objective reality.
There are many studies and thousands of doctors who report using these affordable and plentiful drugs that helped many patients get over COVID in a few days, including President Trump, Joe Rogan and Megyn Kelly.
So why did the FDA/CDC, and a corporate media addicted to BigPharma’s advertising dollars wage a smear campaign against these affordable therapeutics?
Money.
According to the law if there are plentiful therapeutics already on the market, an emergency vaccine cannot be released to the public. Therefore, a PR and an illegal regulatory war against Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine had to take place in order to release what we now know is an unsafe “vaccine” that inoculated no one against anything.
Government health agencies are so captured by the pharmaceutical companies they are supposed to be protecting us from that they broke the law, let people die and let others suffer through lengthy recoveries to make money.
Government illegally retaliated against lab techs who blew the whistle on Pfizer over how ineffective their “vaccine” is.
CDC officials stepped down claiming the agency was rigging the science to meet political demands.
The CDC under President Biden kept redefining the definition of “vaccine” on their web site as more bad news about their “COVID vaccine” became public.
CDC was forced to admit that it falsely claimed that it was monitoring vaccine safety when it was not. The CDC simply did not want to report the adverse effects of the poke.
BigPharma, with their government and media allies, even waged a smear campaign against natural immunity when they knew such claims were false.
Junk science “studies” started appearing claiming these drugs were ineffective, but studies from foreign countries were saying something quite different, as well as more recent studies. BigTech was censoring the information but fortunately there are search engines such as DuckDuckGo did not censor.
A Pfizer scientist was caught bragging on camera that the company was creating new virus’ so they could have a cure ready made for what they had created.
Pfizer is likely the most fined company on Earth for unethical practices. Check out their rap sheet HERE.
Getting the the 5th Circuit court decision Sharyl Atkisson reports:
An appeals court has replied to the FDA's 2021 warnings about using ivermectin to treat Covid, "You are not a horse."
"FDA is not a doctor," writes the court. Later in the court decision, four appellate judges write, "FDA is not a physician. It has authority to inform, announce, and apprise—but not to endorse, denounce, or advise. The Doctors have plausibly alleged that FDA’s Posts fell on the wrong side of the line between telling about and telling to."
FDA is not a physician. It has authority to inform, announce, and apprise—but not to endorse, denounce, or advise. The Doctors have plausibly alleged that FDA’s Posts fell on the wrong side of the line between telling about and telling to.
The court decision is a major victory for Dr. Mary Tally Bowden and two others who sued the FDA; FDA Commissioner Dr. Robert Califf; and its parent agency, HHS. The plaintiffs argued that the FDA overstepped its authority in warding people away from a drug that they say had proven to work for Covid.
Bowden says the FDA propaganda about ivermectin interfered with her ability to help patients, and destroyed her reputation. The FDA's smear of ivermectin was heavily used against medical professionals who chose to prescribe ivermectin, was widely circulated uncritically on social media and on the news, and was cited by medical boards and court filings against prescribing physicians.
In a series of now-infamous tweets, FDA implied ivermectin was dangerous, and that it was intended only for horses and other animals. The appellate judges noted that FDA failed to acknowledge that a safe and effective human form of the medicine has been in use for decades.
On the heels of the government and other vaccine industry interests attacking ivermectin, WalMart and many other pharmacies refused to fill legal prescriptions for the drug and, instead, heavily promoted the experimental vaccines that turned out to be ineffective at preventing Covid infection or transmission.
You can read the 5th Circuit Court’s decision HERE.
UPDATE - Robert Barnes and Viva Frei have commentary: